From what I remember, Bigfoot was changed for the people who play v75 servers, at this time it still had the broken frames. As for your end-game weapon, what a lot of people did back in this day was have two weapons; an end-game weapon for total DPS everywhere else, and one with the right speed to easily pin Bigfoot that doesn't have to be as good.

As someone that has researched bigfoot for almost 50 years (not constantly in that time of course), I find the assumption that bigfoot must not exist to be idiotic and typical. Tribal belief is consistent with evidence that Native Americans have reported identical creatures for hundred of years and longer. There is a telling remark from a Native American that Ivan Sanderson once interviewed in the 1950s. Luckily I found the reference, the old man stated “Oh don’t tell me the White Man has finally gotten around to that?”.Tony Lewis replied on July 11, 2018 - 6:52am. Generally good article, but your first response is not an answer to “Why do people believe in Bigfoot?” It’s an answer to “Why do people feel the need to convince others that Bigfoot exists?” There are plenty of us who know it exists because we’ve seen it, up close, but don’t really care whether you believe us or not.“Believing” in Bigfoot is like early accounts of Europeans encountering gorillas.

It was reasonable for those who had seen gorillas to know they existed. It was also reasonabe for those who hadn’t seen gorillas to disbelieve.Don Frew.Sully replied on August 2, 2018 - 11:50am. I am not looking to prove anything to anybody and don’t need third party verification. I have seen and experienced close encounters with these giants of the forest multiple times and enjoy sharing with interested folks. Skeptics will believe what they choose to believe no mater what is presented and that’s okay, but it is not a free pass card to be rude and abusive.I have attached a preview link to my new book published on Amazon listing my early experiences. Yes they do live and walk among us.Ray Oliver replied on September 15, 2018 - 11:51am. I have read the article and the comments and I am not hear to say whether Bigfoot is real or not I can say though I have am an outdoorsman and I spend most of my time in the woods hunting and fishing it’s a great passion of myne that I enjoy, and for over forty years I have been around the globe hunting for small game big game and fishing and trapping.

Never once have I came across anything that I could not explain or seen any evidence that would conclusively tell me that there was a 7 to 10 foot 600pound creature roaming the area. I have came across hundreds if not thousands of researchers looking for these things and they have all cane up empty handed st least the ones I have came in contact with. I spent my entire life in the woods, and have never seen any sign of these mythical creatures.

I assume most of these people are not real outdoor people and do not understand breeding populations and food sources for these things so I won’t bother to go into that area. But for all these things to exist some scientific proof must be found or all it is is hopes and dreams.Steven krichbaum replied on September 30, 2018 - 8:58am. Great comment. I grew up in the cascades. I’ve had two encounters that changed my thought’s on this subject.

Look at Todd Standings video’s. (plural) The odd thing about these North American Primates is that you get a physical feeling of their presence. Poo on the writer here. Writing is easy, go in the field, learn. Be one with the environment, turn off the camera’s, just listen, look and learn. Standing got his evidence because he fooled them.

Plastic surgery doctors for men without. However, it's important to let your surgeon know if you are seeking a more masculine look to your facial features – a chin with better projection, more prominent cheekbones, a stronger nose.Hair Replacement: The primary consideration for men contemplating is the time involved. Alcohol causes the areas of treated facial skin to become noticeably red and flushed.Changing the Facial Features: Cosmetic procedures such as, and are performed essentially the same way for men and women. Because these procedures strip away the surface layers of skin, you can expect your face to remain sensitive, swollen and bright pink for several weeks after surgery.Some men are happy that the beard growth helps conceal the pinkness of their recovering skin – especially if they feel uncomfortable using camouflage makeup.Men who feel self-conscious about their condition are also advised to give up alcoholic drinks for about 4 weeks.

They new he was there, “they” didn’t see him.Brian Bussey replied on October 27, 2018 - 10:02pm. Great article. I grew up fascinated with the stories and possibilities of BF but as I grow older and the subject has been overrun with hoaxers, hacks, and simply put “idiots” I want to keep believing but refuse to rely on the current BF “researchers” and their biased pseudo science. I’ll keep my belief system simple and just say if the Native Americans (all tribes) made reference to such a creature then surely something had to bring that legend to life.Walt replied on November 12, 2018 - 4:06pm.

Irrational people are those that deny things based on social norms versus investigation and verification. Some call themselves scientists and have many accolades, are college grads with many accomplishments. However, they are in a cocoon of self sustaining belief based on what has already been done or accepted. Therefore they are quite unable to make a rational application on something outside of the mainstream or area of study. It is about keeping faith with your colleagues.If you want to get information on things that are not understood you must look with a critical well balanced investigation. One that is rational being supported by investigative fact.Dan A. Nedrelo replied on November 20, 2018 - 8:00am.

It’s poor journalism to offer opinion before looking deeper into a topic, which you so obviously didn’t do. Look at Jeff Meldrum’s work at Idaho State. Ask yourself why native tribes across the country have over 500 names for this creature. Go hang out with Thomas Sewid on the north end of Vancouver Island. Research the tree structures they leave, many of which are too large and heavy to be made by humans without tractors and equipment you couldn’t get to where they exist miles into the forests.Do some actual research. Then tell us what you think.Lee replied on November 24, 2018 - 10:17am. The indisputable fact is that Bigfoot does not fit the food chain.

When you think of its size and the requirements it would need to satisfy its daily food intake, there would have to be evidence of the creature in terms of its effect on the environment. And if it’s so hard for us to find them, wouldn’t they have trouble finding one another for breeding purposes? And with today’s technology with regard to photographs and electronic detection, not to mention today’s DNA technology, would all of those things be rendered worthless if Bigfoot really is out there, a whole breeding population yet, and we still have not been able to find one shred of reliable proof of its existence, via skeletal remains or solid DNA evidence like what is used in crime-solving? No large hominid bipedal creature could possibly escape all of those methods we have, of modern detection. Well, I don’t want to throw cold waters on anyone’s beliefs, especially if they feel comfortable and content in believing what makes them feel good. But gee, let’s be realistic folks.

I have an open mind but let’s not get into chasing ‘ghosts’ that exist only in our minds. Let’s just utilize a little common sense.Steve Mazer replied on February 16, 2019 - 2:36am. The indisputable fact is that Bigfoot does not fit the food chain. When you think of its size and the requirements it would need to satisfy its daily food intake, there would have to be evidence of the creature in terms of its effect on the environment. And if it’s so hard for us to find them, wouldn’t they have trouble finding one another for breeding purposes? And with today’s technology with regard to photographs and electronic detection, not to mention today’s DNA technology, would all of those things be rendered worthless if Bigfoot really is out there, a whole breeding population yet, and we still have not been able to find one shred of reliable proof of its existence, via skeletal remains or solid DNA evidence like what is used in crime-solving? No large hominid bipedal creature could possibly escape all of those methods we have, of modern detection.

Well, I don’t want to throw cold waters on anyone’s beliefs, especially if they feel comfortable and content in believing what makes them feel good. But gee, let’s be realistic folks. I have an open mind but let’s not get into chasing ‘ghosts’ that exist only in our minds. Let’s just utilize a little common sense.Janon replied on February 16, 2019 - 5:06pm. The outraged comments are so typical you could write them before reading the article, for.every. article, dealing with some ridiculous fairy tale modern humans insist on continuing to believe.

And of course each “tribe” of “true believers” feels the.other. tribes are “crazy”, but not them! Hey now, THATS real. Ah yep.Sorry but dissertation length diabtribes filled with ad hominem insults about “small minds” or, worse still “big brother”, combined with the usual faux science aren’t compelling.And yeah let’s compare the theory that.colonies. of gigantic intelligent bipeds.fill. the forests of North America with.dark matter. (which, by the way, remains just one theory currently being evaluated to explain inconsistencies in quantum physics)These things are.not.

equal outside the mind of a lunatic.shirley replied on February 26, 2019 - 11:08am. When you are standing 25 feet from a creature with a direct line of sight, there is no missing what it is. I estimated 7’ silver/white hair all over the body, hands and arms to the knees. What I really thought was it had a hairy butt and I saw it, Sasquatch October 21 1966, on a camping trip in the middle of the night, getting up to go to the bathroom, with flashlight in hand, BEFORE the Patterson film and I did not know what I was looking at. News came late to our small town. It was March 1968 before our small newspaper printed the story. So what did I see?

I did not know at the time, but I found out when the story reached our town. It was not a dream, not a bear. I was traumatized to the point where I know I was in shock for the next few days, based on what people who was on the trip remember as my behavior the rest of the trip. I am not a liar, nor mistaken, nor an attention seeker. I did not tell my story for 52 years, because my life would have been a living hell in a small town where your reputation is everything. So give folks a break!.Steve Mazer replied on February 26, 2019 - 11:25am. We already know that the Patterson film is an admitted hoax, a total fake photo of a man in a hair suit.

And if it’s a fake (as the perpetrator has already admitted) how many other photos and sightings are, in all probability, fake? The mind boggles at the gullibility of some people. The big problem with it is that some folks in certain areas, like the redwood forests, have made Bigfoot into a kind of a cottage industry, where they operate tourist sites and actually make a living from this. So, I guess we shouldn’t spoil these folks’ livelihoods.shirley replied on February 26, 2019 - 1:22pm.

Excellent comment. Tok the words right out of my mouth. There’s constant attempts to explain this through cognitive dissonance on a mass scale, and we are expected to accept that and other folkloristic explanations that have no physical manifestation rather than the testimony of hundreds of not thousands of people over the last two hundred years or so who all report basically the same thing. Are we really supposed to believe that Native Americans and Europeans have for the past who-knows-how-many years consistently been hoodwinked by some group of large mean who like to emerge from the forest now and then in ape suits? Where’s the physical proof of that? I can accept that there is no physical proof so far for Bigfoot, but I can’t automatically accept that the whole thing is the result of some kind of mass cultural/psychological manifestation. That for me does not address the question of why the same basic thing is reported by so many over so long a period of time over such a large geographic area.Harry replied on March 3, 2019 - 1:54pm.

Excellent comment. Took the words right out of my mouth. There’s constant attempts to explain this through cognitive dissonance on a mass scale, and we are expected to accept that and other folkloristic explanations that have no physical manifestation rather than the testimony of hundreds of not thousands of people over the last two hundred years or so who all report basically the same thing. Are we really supposed to believe that Native Americans and Europeans have for the past who-knows-how-many years consistently been hoodwinked by some group of large men who like to emerge from the forest now and then in ape suits? Where’s the physical proof of that? I can accept that there is no physical proof so far for Bigfoot, but I can’t automatically accept that the whole thing is the result of some kind of mass cultural/psychological manifestation.

That for me does not address the question of why the same basic thing is reported by so many over so long a period of time over such a large geographic area.Harry replied on March 3, 2019 - 2:01pm.